This post is based on an email that was sent and in no way reflects the views and opinions of ''Met'' or To send in a story send your email to [email protected]


The Government will now have to pay a St Mary man more than $12 million in damages after the nation’s second-highest court affirmed a finding by a judge of the Supreme Court that a criminal conviction, which was recorded against his name, was motivated by malice and “deliberately manufactured” by cops.

The award was handed down in the Court of Appeal last week Tuesday and is six times the $2 million Justice Donald McIntosh ordered the Government to pay Dane Anthony Pryce in October 2011 upon the completion of his libel suit.

Pryce challenged the order by Justice McIntosh, arguing, among other things, that $2 million was “inordinately low” and inadequate to restore his reputation.

The cable technician’s legal ordeal began in March 2004 when he was taken into custody at the Oracabessa Police Station in St Mary, along with two other men, all accused of stealing a cord used to operate a satellite dish.

According to the transcript from the libel case, Pryce indicated that he knew nothing about the missing cord and became agitated after a policeman, identified as Constable Maxwell, accused him of taking it “because he had nothing to say”.

He reportedly got up to leave the interrogation room when he was grabbed by the collar, punched in the chest, and pushed into a sitting position in a chair. Pryce noted, too, that another policeman pulled a baton and told him to wait until nightfall “since you bad more than anybody else”.

Pryce stated that he managed to telephone his parents, and after a small commotion at the station and the intervention of a senior officer, he and his co-accused were charged with simple larceny and released on bail with a warning from Maxwell that he was “lucky, but it not over yet”.

The charges were dismissed for want of prosecution after the police and the complainant failed to attend court on several occasions, court records indicate.


Four years later, Pryce enlisted in the Jamaica Defence Force (JDF) and was halfway through the four-month training programme when military commanders surprised him with a document obtained from the Jamaica Constabulary Force’s (JCF) Criminal Records Office (CRO).

According to court documents, the document indicated that he had a conviction for possession of ganja that was recorded in the St Mary Resident Magistrate Court. It indicated, too, that he had been sentenced to a fine of $100, or ten days in prison, and 40 hours of community service.

Despite Pryce’s protest that he had no criminal conviction, the St Mary native was dishonourably discharged from the JDF for deceiving the army “by not disclosing that he was a convict”.

Similarly, Pryce said that applications he sent to the JCF, the British army, and the Bermudian Police Service were rejected because of the false conviction record.

By 2006, according to court records, the CRO confirmed that Pryce did not have a criminal conviction, and lawyers for the Government explained that it was a “genuine error”, which occurred after a constable assigned to the court office in St Mary mistakenly wrote possession of ganja instead of simple larceny.


But McIntosh, in his decision in the Supreme Court, rubbished this assertion.

“When one takes into account the unchallenged evidence relating to the incident at the Oracabessa Police Station … and the purported intention of the police to ‘fix his business properly’, this court is of the view that the conviction was deliberately manufactured and would have been done maliciously and without reasonable and probable cause,” McIntosh said, according to the transcript.

Despite this, McIntosh awarded Pryce $2 million, explaining that his status in life had not been reduced and that there was “no evidence of his social life being destroyed”.

“A conviction for possession of ganja is so common among the young people in the country that one would have to show the nature or effect it had on his standing in his community,” McIntosh said, according to the transcript.

But this finding drew a sharp rebuke from the President of the Court of Appeal, Dennis Morrison, who described it as perplexing.

“The learned judge’s statement that there was no evidence that the appellant’s social life was destroyed is baffling in light of the preponderance of evidence that was adduced in support of this claim. Indeed, there is not a scintilla of evidence that could have led the judge to arrive at that conclusion, which has obviously influenced his award,” Morrison wrote in his decision.


DISCLAIMER The views or opinions appearing on this blog are solely those of their respective authors. In no way do such posts represent the views, opinions or beliefs of "Met," or "Met" and will not assume liability for the opinions or statements, nor the accuracy of such statements, posted by users utilizing this blog to express themselves. Users are advised that false statements which are defamatory in nature may be subject to legal action, for which the user posting such statements will be personally liable for any damages or other liability, of any nature, arising out of the posting of such statements. Comments submitted to this blog may be edited to meet our format and space requirements. We also reserve the right to edit vulgar language and/or comments involving topics we may deem inappropriate for this web site. ****RULES**** 1. Debates and rebuttals are allowed but disrespectful curse-outs will prompt immediate BAN 2. Children are never to be discussed in a negative way 3. Personal information eg. workplace, status, home address are never to be posted in comments. 4. All are welcome but please exercise discretion when posting your comments , do not say anything about someone you wouldnt like to be said about you. 5. Do not deliberately LIE on someone here or send in any information based on your own personal vendetta. 6. If your picture was taken from a prior site eg. fimiyaad etc and posted on JMG, you cannot request its removal. 7. If you dont like this forum, please do not whine and wear us out, do yourself the favor of closing the screen- Thanks! . To send in a story send your email to :- [email protected]

2 comments to this article

  1. Yardielovethug

    on November 23, 2017 at 12:31 pm - Reply

    big up yuh self court of appeal Judge for granting justice to this victim of the corrupt system inna Jamaica.All the police involved should be flogged 77times at high noon and sued and fired forthwith!

  2. PhantomPhoenix

    on November 23, 2017 at 1:51 pm - Reply

    I guess these accounts weren’t damaging.

    “…was dishonourably discharged from the JDF for deceiving the army “by not disclosing that he was a convict”.

    Similarly, Pryce said that applications he sent to the JCF, the British army, and the Bermudian Police Service were rejected because of the false conviction record.”

    YardieT….hail up, Bro.

Leave a Reply to Yardielovethug Cancel reply

[+] kaskus emoticons nartzco

Current day month [email protected] *